
The European Union community is attesting lately to several camouflage events in the European Parliament for promoting the Armenian views on Nagorno-Karabakh region. The events organized under the umbrella of this group of programs in the European Parliament seem to be individually hosted or co-hosted by the members of the European Parliament and Armenian lobby groups in the European Union.
One such event was organized on February 28 entitled “Nagorno-Karabakh EU 1988-2018. Taking stock of 30 years of EU policy on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict”. The organizers of the event were the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) Europe and the European Friends of Armenia (EuFoA). Another such event was organized on February 27 in a public debate format. It was entitled “A Colloquium on The Legal Right of Self-determination for Nagorno-Karabakh”.[1]
It was organized by European Parliament deputies Michèle Rivasi (Verts/A LE) and Lars Adaktusson (EPP), the Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights (ALC), Tufenkian Foundation, and the European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy (EAFJD). As it can be easily understood the ALC, Tufenkian Foundation and the EAFJD are Armenian front foundations in the EU.
The speakers at the colloquium were, Dr. Alfred de Zayas, Dr. Paul Williams, Dr. Sergey Markedonov, Armine Aleksanyan, (Deputy Foreign Minister of Nagorno Karabakh region). Giro Manoyan (Board Member of the Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights) was the moderator.[2]
The colloquium came to several conclusions. One of them was that the Nagorno Karabakh region must be the primary subject and not the object any peace process. Secondly, any people in any country have the right under international law, including those in Nagorno Karabakh region have the right to declare independence. Thirdly, under international law each country must respond without violence to a declaration of independence of people under its jurisprudence. Fourthly, the state occupying the Nagorno Karabakh region should be considered as a state due to several reasons. Among them is that it is a functioning state based on the concept of earned sovereignty; it has institutional capacity; it has a democratically elected government; it has control over its borders, and it has a functioning civil society. Fifthly, the International community should interact with the state occupying the Nagorno Karabakh region regardless of its official status. Sixthly, it is accurate that International law provides a framework for interaction among states. However, international law by itself cannot serve as only tool to solve conflicts. Actors must also use other tools such as politics in resolving conflict. Seventh, confidence-building is a key tool to peace and a final resolution. Finally, escalation of Armenophobia rhetoric and war-mongering should be discouraged and it should be reminded that incitement to violence and hatred is prohibited by international law.[3]
Despite coming to the above-mentioned conclusions, firstly, none of the participants felt the need to mention Azerbaijan or the Azerbaijani as the primary subject of the conflict or the peace process. Secondly, none of the participants felt the need to mention the amount of violence the Armenians had utilized in achieving their goals in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Thirdly, the argument that it is a democratically functioning region totally disregards the 600000 Azerbaijanis evicted by force and violence by the Armenians. After the neighboring areas occupied by Armenia, this number goes up to one million.[4] Regarding the region as a functioning democracy disregards the fact that these 600000 Azerbaijanis cannot vote in the region.
It is certain that such camouflaged initiatives executed under the ceiling of the European Parliament with the association of some members of the Parliament cannot certainly make any favorable contribution to the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In fact, on the opposite such actions only increase the risk of further conflict. Furthermore, they decrease respectability of European Parliament. This in turn brings down chances of the European Union to contribute to the peace process in the Nagorno-Karabakh region.
*Photo: The European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy
[1] Harut Sassounian, “International Legal Expert Affirms Artsakh’s Right of Self-Determination,” The California Courier, n.d., www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com.
[2] “Renowned International Scholars to Discuss Artsakh Peace Process at the European Parliament,” Tufenkian Foundation, February 22, 2018, http://www.tufenkianfoundation.org/news/renowned-international-scholars-to-discuss-artsakh-peace-process-at-the-european-parliament.
[3] “Nagorno Karabakh Must Be the Primary Subject and Not an Object of the Peace Process” Say Prominent International Scholars,” The European Armenian Federation for Justice and Democracy, February 28, 2018, http://www.eafjd.eu/RemedialSecessionPr.html.
[4] “Azerbaijan: After More than 20 Years, IDPs Still Urgently Need Policies to Support Full Integration,” Internal Displacement Monitoring Center, March 26, 2014, http://www.internal-displacement.org/europe-the-caucasus-and-central-asia/azerbaijan/2014/azerbaijan-after-more-than-20-years-idps-still-urgently-need-policies-to-support-full-integration/.
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
JOE BIDEN’S STATEMENT ON 1915 EVENTS: PURPOSEFUL POLITICAL ACTIONS MAY CAUSE UNANTICIPATED CONSEQUENCES, AN ANALYSIS FROM THE SOCIOLOGICAL VIEWPOINT
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 03.05.2021 -
POPE’S VISIT TO AZERBAIJAN: A TEST FOR UNIVERSAL FRATERNITY
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 09.09.2016 -
RUSSIA’S REACTION AGAINST GREECE'S HOSTILE BEHAVIORS AND VIOLATIONS OF THE DEMILITARIZATION PROVISIONS OF THE 1947 PARIS TREATY
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 29.12.2022 -
AN EXEMPLARY FIGURE IN DIPLOMACY AND HISTORY: IN MEMORY OF RETIRED AMBASSADOR BİLAL ŞİMŞİR
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 10.05.2024 -
URGENT NEED TO STRENGTHEN THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 16.04.2020
-
THE TURKISH-ARMENIAN DISPUTE: WHO HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE?
Maxime GAUIN 13.10.2014 -
AVİM HELD A MEETING ENTITLED “TURKISH-ARMENIAN QUESTION: IN THE LIGHT OF THE HEARING OF PERINÇEK v. SWITZERLAND CASE ON JANUARY 28TH”
AVİM 04.02.2015 -
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION AFTER THE HOLIDAYS - I
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 05.09.2011 -
AMERICA ON THE WANE: THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISGRACES ITSELF AND LOSES CREDIBILITY
AVİM 26.11.2019 -
MACRON'S UNDERSTANDING OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: EVERYONE HAS THE RIGHT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, BUT SOME HAVE IT MORE THAN OTHERS
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 27.10.2020
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"