According to the Armenian press, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, during his two-day visit to Brussels on 11-13 July on the occasion of participating in the NATO Summit, also met with the two top European Union officials. He reportedly held separate talks with President of the European Council Donald Tusk and the President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker in the margins of the NATO Summit. [1]
Pursuant to information provided by the Armenian Prime Minister’s press office, both of the EU officials praised the recent democratic change in Armenia’s government. Tusk is quoted to have said that “what happened in Armenia was special and, I would say, very European” regarding the mass protests that brought Pashinian to power in May of this year. Tusk is claimed to have said that “your example is very promising and you can count on EU assistance in implementing reforms.” The same news report asserts that “Pashinian assured Tusk and Juncker that his cabinet is committed to democratizing Armenia’s political system, strengthening the rule of law and combatting corruption.”[2]
Pashinian also met with the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission Federica Mogherini in Brussels on 11 July. According to the European External Action Service;
“The two discussed the new Armenian government's clear commitment to reform and the concrete action already taken to this end. […] Mogherini confirmed that the European Union stands ready to provide concrete support to reforms, including through technical and financial assistance, and highlighted the fight against corruption and judicial reform as areas of particular importance. The High Representative also stressed the EU's readiness to provide assistance for the organization and monitoring of the next elections, to be held in line with OSCE/ODIHR recommendations.”[3]
Mogherini also “confirmed her and the European Union's strong support for the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict” and said that “it is vital that the sides engage fully in negotiations without preconditions, under the auspices of the Minsk Group Co-Chairs.”
However, while speaking to reporters at the end of his visit to Brussels, Pashinian reportedly complained that “the EU has still not promised extra aid to his government.” He said that he expressed his” bewilderment” at this fact in his first talks with EU leaders. The “bewilderment” of Pashinian, as reported by the press, was met with a response by the Head of the EU Delegation in Yerevan Piotr Switalski. He rightfully and realistically stated that;
“… the European Union needs to hear ‘very concrete ideas’ from the new Armenian government before it can consider increasing economic assistance, […] the [Armenian] government has yet to come up with a set of specific reform-oriented projects requiring EU funding. We would like to hear from the Armenian government concrete ideas. In what form, in what way can the European Union be helpful? In some ministries we have already received some preliminary ideas. We would like to have a comprehensive view. And when we have this view we will discuss how we can help.”[4]
It should be mentioned at this point that the EU has pledged to provide up to 160 million euros of aid money to Armenia for the period of 2017-2021 in line with the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between the EU and Armenia. CEPA was signed on the margins of the Eastern Partnership Summit held in Brussels on 24 November 2017 and entered into provisional application on 1 June 2018. The first meeting of the Partnership Council under the Agreement was held on 21 June 2018.[5]
The cooperation and aid framework between the EU and Armenia has thus already been established. However, as evident from the statements of EU officials, it is not enough for the Armenian Prime Minister Pashinian to boast that the previous corrupt and unconstructive Armenian government has been replaced with a new one, nor is it enough to simply proclaim that bright days are ahead for Armenia. It is obvious that the EU is in definite need of hearing from the Armenian government concrete ideas about how the EU and Armenia should proceed together and that the that Armenian government has yet to come up with specific reform-oriented projects requiring EU funding.
It should be also kept in mind that the EU has recently adopted a “merit-based” approach for the new prospective EU members.[6] In the context of the new EU reform discussions, this approach should be deemed valid for all other EU engagements. The “merit-based” approach brings objective criteria for further engagements and creates competition between prospective EU members that all are looking to demonstrate that they are the most deserving of EU economic assistance. In the light of the foregoing, it is possible to state that Armenia, at this point of time, lacks the merits for increased EU economic assistance because it has put forth more words than deeds.
* Photo: https://ec.europa.eu/
[1] “Armenian Prime Minister to Attend NATO Summit in Brussels,” Arka News Agency, October 8, 2018, http://arka.am/en/news/politics/armenian_prime_minister_to_attend_nato_summit_in_brussels/.
[2] “EU Reaffirms Support for New Armenian Government’s Reform Agenda,” Azatutyun, December 7, 2018, https://www.azatutyun.am/a/29359858.html.
[3] “European Union External Actions. HR/VP Federica Mogherini Meets with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan,” European Union External Action, July 11, 2018, https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/48279/hrvp-federica-mogherini-meets-armenian-prime-minister-nikol-pashinyan_en.
[4] “EU Envoy Responds To Criticism From Armenian PM,” Azatutyun, July 16, 2018, https://www.azatutyun.am/a/29368045.html.
[5] Teoman Ertuğrul Tulun, “The New Legal Basis for EU-Armenia Relations,” Center For Eurasian Studies (AVİM), June 2018, sec. Analysis.
[6] “Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions . A Credible Enlargement Perspective for and Enhanced EU Engagement with the Western Balkans” (European Commission, June 2, 2018), COM(2018) 65 final. P. 2., https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/communication-credible-enlargement-perspective-western-balkans_en.pdf.
© 2009-2024 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
WHAT WILL RUSSIA DO IN RESPONSE TO THE REVISIONIST MILITARIZATION OF THE DODECANESE BY GREECE?
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 01.08.2022 -
A GREEK PONTUS TV DRAMA MAKES MOCKERY OF HISTORICAL FACTS
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 31.08.2020 -
THE NINETY-SEVENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SIGNING OF THE PEACE TREATY OF LAUSANNE
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 21.07.2020 -
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION AND THE TERRORIST ATTACK AT CHRISTCHURCH
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 15.03.2019 -
GREECE’S “CHERRY-PICKING” POLICY IN INVOKING THE RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 31.08.2020
-
WHERE IS THE NOVELTY IN ARMENIA’S FOREIGN POLICY?
Tutku DİLAVER 11.04.2019 -
THE DOCUMENTS EXPOSING CHINA’S HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 27.12.2021 -
CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IN ARMENIA
AVİM 10.07.2020 -
THE BURNING DOWN OF IZMIR AND ANOTHER DILEMMA WITH THE ARMENIAN ALLEGATIONS
Alev KILIÇ 14.12.2012 -
POPE FRANCIS SHOULD HEED PATRIARCH KIRILL’S REMARKS
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 12.01.2016
-
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2023 -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2022 -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
EU-TÜRKİYE COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA AND SOUTH CAUCASUS: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ENGAGEMENT IN ENERGY AND CONNECTIVITY -
AVİM 2023 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
ÇAĞDAŞ BATI AVRUPA AKADEMİ DÜNYASINDA IRKÇILIĞIN VE YABANCI DÜŞMANLIĞININ ARAŞTIRILMASININ ZORLUĞU: FRANSA ÖRNEĞİ
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"