The campaign starting in Armenia for the presidential election to be held on 18 February 2013 provides insights to internal political movements, restrictions, difficulties, projection towards the future and the level of democracy in Armenia. As more has surfaced recently, it could be perceived that the presidential election would create an atmosphere where it could lead to a vicious competition between those who see their future with the US and EU and are openly encouraged in this direction and those who are conscious of the existing strong ties with Russia and believe in its benefits, such a development would create political chaos and the level of relations attained with both sides could be harmed.
As a result of the calculations and bargains understandably made, the main opposition has decided not to nominate a candidate. Consequently, for the current President to be re-elected has become a formality waiting the elections. While reaching this understanding, the leader of the main opposition and its representatives have met with EU officials in Brussels and most likely have received their consent. From the government wing, the Prime Minister has paid a visit to the US, has met with US Vice-President and has probably made satisfactory promises. An indication that the US has been convinced could be seen with the remittance of 235 million dollars granted through the ‘Millennium Challenges Corporation’ which was first introduced in 2006 and revoked after the 2008 elections. In this situation, it is possible to say that Armenia will be able to continue to play its customers in the coming four years.
While speaking in the governing party congress where the President was officially nominated as candidate on December 15, he emphasized his priorities in foreign policy in the order that they will improve partnership with the Russian Federation, implementing programs that would strengthen their strategic cooperation, will improve and enlarge friendly partnership with the US, will continue their policy of getting closer to Europe and will further strengthen their relations with the European countries.
However, the President’s statements concerning the region has been disappointing and alarming in terms of stability and neighborly relations. His priority in his speech has been the recognition and condemnation of the well known Armenian allegations against Turkey in Armenia, Karabakh and the Diaspora up to 2015 as a milestone, these initiatives to be carried to a new dramatic level at international organizations, states and the international community including the Turkish public. His second priority was allocated to the issue of Karabakh, irrespective of being part of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity, insisted on its fate to be determined exclusively by those remaining in the region after the forced evacuation of the Azerbaijani population.
While burning down all bridges with its neighbors, the President, on the other hand, has not refrained from complaining and even threatening about Armenia being isolated in the region by saying that “implementation of regional programs while isolating Armenia is not viable and will hinder regional stability”. It is not known how this stitch in the eyes of the Armenian officials will be overcome, but it should be understood by all that it is Armenia that isolates itself in the region, regional projects very well continue without its participation, new projects spring to life and it is Armenia and the Armenian people who extensively have to migrate abroad that suffers.
© 2009-2024 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
THERE ARE JUDGES IN STRASBOURG
Alev KILIÇ 15.10.2015 -
QUEST FOR A NEW ORDER AND UNITY IN EURASIA WITH RUSSIA IN THE LEAD
Alev KILIÇ 27.11.2012 -
G-8, BRICS and G-20 , COMPETITION AMONG GLOBAL ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS
Alev KILIÇ 19.06.2013 -
HOW IS THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA INFLUENCED
Alev KILIÇ 06.05.2013 -
CAN THE EUROPEAN UNION’S EURO CRISIS BE RESOLVED
Alev KILIÇ 13.11.2012
-
A REVIEW OF THE 1915 VAN REVOLT - BEFORE AND AFTER, ARGUMENTS AND DISTORTIONS
Ahmet Can ÖKTEM 06.09.2021 -
AVIM WEBINAR VIDEO REMOVED FROM A SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM HAS BEEN REINSTATED
AVİM 27.06.2022 -
NAGORNO-KARABAKH AND CRIMEA: A COMPARISON OF DOUBLE STANDARDS
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 31.03.2014 -
WATS AND THE TEFLON LINING TO WHICH NOTHING STICKS
AVİM 20.09.2017 -
CAN SREBRENICA GENOCIDE BE COMPARED TO THE EVENTS OF 1915 WITHIN THE SCOPE OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION?
AVİM 16.12.2019
-
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2023 -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2022 -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
EU-TÜRKİYE COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA AND SOUTH CAUCASUS: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ENGAGEMENT IN ENERGY AND CONNECTIVITY -
AVİM 2023 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
ÇAĞDAŞ BATI AVRUPA AKADEMİ DÜNYASINDA IRKÇILIĞIN VE YABANCI DÜŞMANLIĞININ ARAŞTIRILMASININ ZORLUĞU: FRANSA ÖRNEĞİ
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"