Ömer Engin LÜTEM
Honorary President of AVIM
18.02.2015
In a letter addressed to National Assembly Speaker Sahakyan, President Sargsyan indicated that a decision was made to recall Turkey-Armenia Protocols signed on October 10, 2009 in Zurich from the parliament. He justified this decision with what he calls the lack of political will in Turkey, Turkey’s distortion of the spirit and letter of the Protocols, continuation of its policy of setting preconditions and the new momentum in its "policy of denial" on the 100th anniversary of the “Armenian Genocide” as well.
As is known, Armenia opposed Turkey’s decision to link the ratification and the implementation of the Protocols signed to establish diplomatic relations and cooperation between Turkey and Armenia to the positive developments in the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. It insisted on the implementation of the Protocols without preconditions, gained support from the US and EU, and withdrew the Protocols from the Parliament’s weekly agenda in 2010 when Turkey didn’t change its attitude. However, the Protocols, despite not being discussed, continued to be in the parliament’s agenda. The matter at hand now is the complete withdrawal of the protocols from the parliament’s agenda. The important matter here is that the Protocols are rejected and will be resent to the parliament when the required conditions are met. When viewed from this aspect, President Sargsyan’s withdrawal of the protocols from the Parliament has no sense other than influencing the public opinion.
Why did President Sargsyan act in such a manner? His above-mentioned complaints about Turkey, which he uses as excuses, are nothing new. So there must be other reasons for the withdrawal of the Protocols from the parliament now.
The most important development in Armenia recently is the disagreement between the Prosperous Armenia Party- especially its leader Tsarukyan- and Sarkisian which is deepening, which led to street demonstrations and has the possibility to turn into a serious crisis. It is possible that Sargsyan wants to gain support in the public by recalling the Protocols from the parliament.
It is understood that Sargsyan and his government, although not openly spoken, has problems with Russia. Among these are: Armenia’s efforts to enhance relations with the European Union and NATO despite joining the Eurasian Economic Union, Russia’s ongoing arms sales to Azerbaijan, Russia’s dominance in many sectors in the economy of Armenia and lastly, Armenian government’s refusal to thwart the anti-Russia climate following the murder of an Armenian family by a Russian soldier serving in the Russian base in Gyumri. Tsarukyan, known for his close relations with Russia, could be an alternative for presidency.
Sargsyan probably took such a possibility into consideration and strengthened his position by enabling the Dashnaks, which are principally against Russia, to participate in the government. The Dashnaks were represented in the government with the election of Robert Kocharyan as president in 1998 and left the government in 2009 in protest of the signing of the Turkey-Armenia Protocols. They required the rejection of the Protocols for their return to the government. Sarkisian, knowing that the rejection of the Protocols would not be welcomed by the US, EU and even Russia, didn’t do this and tried to satisfy the Dashnaks by taking this half step through the withdrawal of the Protocols from the Parliament. Giro Manoyan of the Dashnak Party considered it as positive but insufficient step and stated that the Protocols must be rejected.
© 2009-2024 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN ARMENIA
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 19.02.2013 -
ARMENIAN GENOCIDE FILMS FAIL TO WIN ACCLAIM
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 08.09.2014 -
RESOLUTION RECEIVING ONLY TWO VOTES
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 15.12.2011 -
THE US AND TURKEY-ARMENIA RELATIONS
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 17.06.2012 -
ARMENIA 2013 (1)
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 06.01.2013
-
A CONTROVERSIAL AND EMBARRASSING ACADEMIC APPOINTMENT BY AN AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
AVİM 13.04.2023 -
THE US’ BLACK SEA STRATEGY AND TÜRKİYE FACTOR
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 04.12.2023 -
ARMENIAN LEGAL ATTEMPTS ARE FUTILE
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 27.02.2017 -
STATE CEREMONY HELD FOR STRUMA VICTIMS
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 04.03.2015 -
SARKISYAN AWARDED AGOS COLUMNIST
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 30.05.2017
-
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2023 -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2022 -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
EU-TÜRKİYE COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA AND SOUTH CAUCASUS: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ENGAGEMENT IN ENERGY AND CONNECTIVITY -
AVİM 2023 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
ÇAĞDAŞ BATI AVRUPA AKADEMİ DÜNYASINDA IRKÇILIĞIN VE YABANCI DÜŞMANLIĞININ ARAŞTIRILMASININ ZORLUĞU: FRANSA ÖRNEĞİ
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"