The ‘European Neighborhood Policy’ which the European Union started implementing in 2004 with a view to developing closer relations with Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and countries of the Mediterranean, later on was transformed into a separate ‘Eastern Partnership’ program reinforced with political and financial stimulants for the three East European countries of the former Soviet geography (Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine) and the three Caucasian countries (Azerbaijan, Georgia and Armenia).
Rather than adopting a holistic approach to this privileged program designed for these six countries, the European Union has opted to differentiate within itself, deciding to address each on a country by country basis. Thus, justification for a favorable approach towards Armenia has emerged. This situation has been displayed once again with the annual “European Neighborhood Policy Progress Report” publicized on the 20th of March.
A comparative review of Azerbaijan and Armenia in the report provides the occassion for an observation of striking prejudice. The EU Commission has urged the Armenian Government to step up its work to implement and enforce human rights legislation. The report also underlined the need to address shortcomings in Armenia’s recent presidential elections. Notwithstanding, Armenia has been assessed to qualify for developing closer relations with the EU, clearing its way for deepened cooperation. On the other hand, the report does not take into consideration Armenia’s occupation of a neighboring country’s territories and its adamant continuation to do so. Thus, beyond turning a blind eye to the occupation, the European Union appears to tolerate and even lend its support to this situation. Concerning the region of Nagorno-Karabakh which only forms a part of the territories under occupation, the report states the following: The EU urged “Armenia to intensify efforts with Azerbaijan to reach an agreement and ensure unimpeded access to representatives for EU representatives to the area and surrounding regions”.
As regards to Azerbaijan, it faces a strong barrage of criticism and although not openly stated, the door to cooperation at a higher level is shunned. Furthermore, as if to rub salt into Azerbaijan’s bleeding wound, the report calls upon Baku to reach an agreement with Armenia over its separatist territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. As if the country whose territorial integrity is violated and its territories, in addition to Nagorno-Karabakh, seven of its provinces are occupied is not Azerbaijan, as if the country occupying and continuing its occupation despite the UN resolution is not Armenia, the European Union has not seen any harm in publishing a report that depicts the situation as if the sides share equal responsibility, that reflects the mentality that both sides are victims and takes a partial attitude at the expense of clearly violating international law, equity and justice.
The mindset this report reflects once again displays that rather than promoting a continental and global comprehensive vision and opening, the European Union has not been able to escape the shallowness of being a fortress Europe, that it continues to reinforce its ranks on a religious basis and sustains narrow mindedness. The report serves as yet another confirmation that, following the meeting held with the members of the so-called government of Nagorno-Karabakh, the Eastern Partnership Summit, envisaged to be hosted by Lithuania this year in November, cannot be neutral. It also reinforces the perception that fortress Europe has started designing the borders in the north-east that started to be drawn with the shameful Schengen barbed wire erected alongside the Maritsa River.
© 2009-2024 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
THE BALKANS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
Alev KILIÇ 14.01.2013 -
THE MOSCOW SUMMIT OF THE COLLECTIVE SECURITY TREATY ORGANIZATION
Alev KILIÇ 24.12.2012 -
FORTRESS EUROPE PROPELS TURKEY TOWARDS EURASIA
Alev KILIÇ 11.02.2013 -
ARMENIA’S NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ON THE TURKISH BORDER
Alev KILIÇ 22.10.2012 -
ARMENIAN TERROR
Alev KILIÇ 24.01.2013
-
THE EU'S REFUGEE POLICY IN LIGHT OF VON DER LEYEN'S VISIT TO EGYPT AND THE CASE OF RWANDA
Selenay Erva YALÇIN 10.07.2024 -
THE BRICS SUMMIT 2023
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 25.09.2023 -
A REVIEW OF THE 1915 VAN REVOLT - BEFORE AND AFTER, ARGUMENTS AND DISTORTIONS
Ahmet Can ÖKTEM 06.09.2021 -
A NEW FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCY IN ARMENIA
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 02.01.2023 -
TAIWAN (REPUBLIC OF CHINA) COULD BE SIGNIFICANT IN TURKEY’S OPENING TO ASIA.
Alev KILIÇ 07.11.2013
-
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2023 -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2022 -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
EU-TÜRKİYE COOPERATION IN CENTRAL ASIA AND SOUTH CAUCASUS: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ENGAGEMENT IN ENERGY AND CONNECTIVITY -
AVİM 2023 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
ÇAĞDAŞ BATI AVRUPA AKADEMİ DÜNYASINDA IRKÇILIĞIN VE YABANCI DÜŞMANLIĞININ ARAŞTIRILMASININ ZORLUĞU: FRANSA ÖRNEĞİ
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"