
American sociologist Robert Merton, in his article titled “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action”, explained the historical background of the unanticipated consequences of purposeful actions and discussed the impact of these actions on society and its individuals.[1] He stated that unforeseen consequences, separate from desirable foreseeable consequences, are necessarily undesirable from the standpoint of the actor (the decision-maker). For though these results are unintended, they are not upon their occurrence always deemed axiologically negative. According to Merton, the intended and anticipated outcomes of purposive action are always, in the very nature of the case, relatively desirable to the those who take the action. In the case of states, those who take actions can be considered as political decision makers. Merton asserts that these actions may seem axiologically negative to an outside observer who was negatively affected by the decision. Merton points out that the effects of the unintended consequences of purposeful actions differ between the decision-maker of the action and the other side who will be adversely affected from this action. Taking Merton’s approach as a basis, it should be considered that even if the main purpose of the decision-making is not to harm or victimize the other side, the consequences of purposeful actions can cause irritation in the other side adversely affected by the action. This may lead to the emergence of strong reactions at the societal level in the adversely affected side. In this framework, it would be worthwhile to briefly evaluate the recent statement by the US President Joe Biden on the 24 April Armenian Remembrance Day in terms of Robert Merton’s notable concept of unintended consequences.[2]
Certain political commentators draw attention to several terms and expressions used in the mentioned statement such as “Ottoman era”, “Ottoman authorities”, “Constantinople”, and “we do this not to cast blame”. They assert that the statement, in its essence, tries to avoid targeting the Republic of Turkey and Turks and confines its accusations to the “Ottoman authorities”. Considering only the writing style of the statement, as in remaining at the superficial level, it is possible to get such an optimistic impression. However, from a careful reading, it is not difficult to understand that such terms and expressions are meant to camouflage an unacceptable terminology (“genocide”) that is used both at the beginning and the end of the statement. It is also possible to say that such an effort reflects a purposeful action to demonstrate to the adversely affected (Turkish) side that sufficient attention has been paid to them while preparing the statement.
Yet, the entirety of the text and the main purpose of the preparation of the statement reveal who and which nationalities or nations are targeted positively and negatively. In the text, one side (Armenian) is historically pampered and honored, while the other side (Turkish) is aggrieved for the main purpose of the preparation of the statement even if it is not intentional and sought to be avoided. This result, in my judgement, is compatible with the “unintended consequences” concept of Robert Merton and the process he described for reaching such a conclusion.
Individuals who consider themselves being treated unfairly usually develop their reactions at the societal level independent of the state level reactions against the actors they think have treated them unfairly. In this sense, societies, like states, have an instinct to protect themselves. This type of behavior is also valid for the Turks who will think that an injustice has been done to them within the framework of Biden’s statement. It is highly likely that this statement will be viewed as an unjust accusation and attack against Turkish identity by a significant portion of the Turkish people. It would not be surprising that such an interpretation will lead to an increase in the need inevitably felt to protect Turkish identity, resulting in increased levels of nationalist and anti-imperialist sentiments in the short and medium term.
*Photo: https://egeada2.angelfire.com/
[1] Robert K. Merton, “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action,” American Sociological Review 1, no. 6 (December 1936): 894–904, https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615.
[2] “Statement by President Joe Biden on Armenian Remembrance Day” (The White House, April 24, 2021), Statments and Relseases, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/24/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-armenian-remembrance-day/.
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
-
Saygılı, N. - Joe Biden commit a big mistake!..
J. Biden be assured that his statement of April 24, 2021 had a very negative impact on the Turkish people as well as on the Turkish-Americans. I don't think it is good for him and/or his people; but a few could have delighted like the fanatic Dhashnakists. That's all ... 20.05.2021
-
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA ELECTION RESULTS SIGNAL ROUGH CHALLENGES FOR EU DESIGNS IN THE BALKANS
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 16.10.2018 -
EUROPEAN CURE=ARMENIAN AFFLICTION: PRONOUNCING HATE SPEECH UNDER THE GUISE OF NATIONALISM
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 09.10.2018 -
THE SHATTERING OF REGIONAL ANCHOR FOR STABILITY: THE PASSING OF KING BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 28.11.2016 -
ARMENIA, EU AND A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 27.07.2018 -
DISTORTING THE HISTORY THROUGH THE REALNESS OF NAİM BEY
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 04.01.2017
-
A VIEW ABOUT 18TH MEETING OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION COUNCIL OF HEADS OF MEMBER STATES
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 19.06.2018 -
THE POLITICAL DEADLOCK IN GEORGIA HAS COME TO AN END
Ceyda ACİCBE 06.05.2021 -
CATHOLICOS KAREKIN II-PATRIARCH MANOUGIAN DISPUTE, AND THE 2015 ENCYCLICAL
Mehmet Oğuzhan TULUN 13.01.2015 -
THE CLAIMS AGREEMENT BETWEEN TURKEY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SIGNED AT ANKARA, 25 OCTOBER 1934 AND ITS LEGALLY BINDING IMPACT ON COMPENSATION CLAIMS OF US CITIZENS OF ARMENIAN DESCENT
AVİM 14.01.2020 -
UKRAINE’S DECISION CONCERNING “THE STATUS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES”
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 11.08.2021
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER -
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE
-
THE SEARCH FOR REGIONAL STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR: VIEWS FROM GEORGIA AND TURKEY