29 May 2015
Ömer Engin LÜTEM
Like every year, the Sardarapat “victory”, which is claimed to be won against the Ottoman Empire in 1918, was celebrated this year.
Sardarapat is the name of a place near Erivan. In Turkish historical sources and in serious foreign sources, there is no mention of such a victory bearing this name. When researched, it is seen that following Russia’s withdrawal from the First World War, the Ottoman Empire attacked to take back the territories it lost, repelled Armenians who occupied the territories left behind by Russians and even took the city of Gyumri in Armenia. It is also seen that during the Ottoman army’s march to the east from Gyumri, the Ottoman forces encountered resistance from Armenian forces near Bash Abaran, Karakilisa and especially in Sardarapat, stopped and slightly retreated.
While the clashes were continuing, Armenian and Ottoman delegates were negotiating in Batum in order to reach an agreement. After a short while, these negotiations concluded and a treaty was signed in Batum on June 4 which determined the borders of Armenia. According to this treaty, Sardarapat was given to the Ottoman Empire and thus the resistance in Sardarapat had lost its meaning.
As it is seen, the Sardarapat “victory” is nothing more than the brief stoppage of the Ottoman forces, therefore could not be considered as a military victory. On the other hand, statement by Armenians claim that the victory in Sardarapat prevented the destruction of the Armenian nation by the Ottoman army. However it is a known fact that Armenians were not the target of the Ottoman army. Ottoman army’s aim was to reach to Baku as soon as possible and pass to the other side of the Caspian Sea if possible.
There is no mention of the Sardarapat “victory” in the early period of the Soviet Union. Later, beginning from 1960’s, after the revelation of Jupiter missiles in Turkey following the Cuban Missile Crisis, the idea of using Armenian nationalism became prominent as a means to be used as a trump card against Turkey when needed. In this context, a genocide memorial was erected in Yerevan in 1967 and in 1968, on the 50th anniversary of the battle, several memorials were built near Sardarapat dedicated to the “victory”. Since then, flamboyant ceremonies are held in the genocide memorial on April 24 and in Sardarapat on May 26. When viewed from this aspect, it is seen that the Sardarapat “victory” is an invention by the Soviets rather than the Armenians.
The Armenian public opinion and governments which are dominated by ultra-nationalist sentiments immediately adopted this virtual victory and started to celebrate it. The lack of an Armenian state for centuries, therefore the lack of victories to be celebrated by Armenians has a major role in this. In this respect, the Sardarapat “victory” filled a void. Additionally, this fictive victory against the Ottomans became an opportunity for the expression of negative sentiments against the Turks and a means for national self-praise, insomuch that unrealistic comments were made such as the Turkish armies who won the Battle of Gallipoli lost to the Armenians in Serdarapat.
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
THE NECESSITY FOR A NEW STRATEGY
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 27.05.2015 -
DECISION OF THE FRENCH CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 29.02.2012 -
ARMENIA SUSPENDS THE RATIFICATION OF THE PROTOCOLS
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 22.04.2010 -
TURKEY-ARMENIA PROTOCOLS: THE FIRST YEAR
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 11.10.2010 -
REACTIONS TOWARD ERDOĞAN’S MESSAGE
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 28.04.2014
-
THE NEW LEGAL BASIS FOR EU-ARMENIA RELATIONS
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 31.07.2018 -
A MODEL THAT NEEDS TO BE DEVELOPED FOR REGIONAL COOPERATION: ECONOMIC COOPERATION ORGANIZATION
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 21.04.2021 -
ACADEMIC ETHICS AND ARCHIVES: THE KRIKOR GUERGUERIAN ARCHIVE ADDS LITTLE NEW TO THE DEBATE
AVİM 07.02.2019 -
THE ‘ARMENIAN QUESTION’ IN UKRAINE - II: THE ADVOCATES OF THE ‘ARMENIAN CAUSE’ IN UKRAINE
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 10.05.2021 -
THE ZURICH PROTOCOLS AND DIASPORA
Tutku DİLAVER 21.03.2018
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2022 -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"