
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the highest chamber of the Court, announced the final judgment on the ECtHR Perincek v. Switzerland case. The Grand Chamber held that Switzerland has violated Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) regarding freedom of expression, and has therefore unjustly restricted Doğu Perincek’s freedom of expression.
This judgement is final and it constitutes an important case-law. To begin with, it establishes a strong basis for how in the future the European countries should interpret the right to freedom of expression and the balance between that right and its exceptions.
Armenian side has been busy with trying to distort the meaning and the spirit of this judgment. Meanwhile, the lawyers of Armenia Amal Clooney and Geoffrey Robertson championed the judgement,[1] together with the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Armenia who stated that Armenia’s “requests from the Court were fully met”.
Still, no one from the Armenian side could have grotesquely distorted the ECtHR’s judgment as much as Harout Sassounian did when he wrote a piece titled “To Ban Genocide Denial, Court Incites Armenians to Commit Violence”.[2] According to Sassounian, “Grand Chamber is actually inciting Armenians to resort to violence to satisfy the Court’s requirement that genocide denial could only be criminalized if it is followed by some sort of violent reaction”, a reaction which he defines later as “bashing Perincek’s head”. This clearly does not reflect the seemingly joyous and victorious attitude the Armenians want us to believe. On the contrary, the hatred and call to violence by Sassounian is the only sincere reaction the Armenian radicals have expressed, showing their frustration, their embedded enmity towards Turkey and the Turks, and the threat that they might resort to violence for their own ends.
Radicals like Sassounian never needed any superficial excuses that they fabricate out of court judgments to resort to violence. Those who acquaint themselves with the history of the Turkish Armenian relations know that this is not an empty threat if it comes from Armenians like Sassounian. Armenian terrorism cost the lives of 31 Turkish diplomats not very long ago. Turkish people living abroad, as well as the citizens of other countries who did not agree with the Armenian allegations, have been under constant attack by the Armenian organizations. Renowned academics including Prof. Stanford Shaw (whose house was bombed), Prof. Bernard Lewis (convicted for his academic research), Prof. Justin McCarthy, Maxime Gauin, and several others were either physically or psychologically harassed or -albeit politically- charged and convicted just because of expressing their scholarly views.[3]
ECtHR Grand Chamber’s Judgment on Perincek v. Switzerland case is a crushing defeat for radical Armenians. Basic rights and principles such as freedom of expression, fight against racial hatred, and discrimination have never been the main concern of the Armenian radicals. Instead, the controversy over the events of 1915 have been politicized, dogmatized, and become a part of political psychological discourse for building-up an identity against the Turks and Turkey. When this happens, no historical, philosophical, legal, or meaningful political debate becomes possible. Thus, this case is an evidence of the failure of reactionary position of the Armenians and Armenia to impose a particularly dogmatic discourse into parliaments of third countries, prevent and overwhelm any historical debate, statement, or self-expression contrary to the basic human right of freedom of expression. We sincerely hope that the Armenian side (including ferocious radicals like Sassounian) will from now on question that stance and realize their call to any kind of violence will only serve to further poison Turkish-Armenian relations.
[1] “Robertson, Clooney Issue Statement on ECHR Ruling”, Asbarez, 15 October 2015, http://asbarez.com/140771/robertson-clooney-issue-statement-on-echr-ruling/
[2] Harout Sassounian, “To Ban Genocide Denial, Court Incites Armenians to Commit Violence”, California Courier, 20 October 2015, http://www.thecaliforniacourier.com/to-ban-genocide-denial-court-incites-armenians-to-commit-violence/
[3] Pulat Tacar , “Armenian Juridical Attempts to Convict Those Who Reject the Armenian Genocide Claims and to Get Reparations From Turkey”, Ermeni Araştırmaları, Issue #50 (2015), pp. 395-470.
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
BAKALIAN CASE APPEAL HEARING HELD IN CALIFORNIA
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 08.02.2019 -
US PRESIDENT TRUMP’S STATEMENT
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 26.04.2017 -
“ARMENIA-TURKEY NORMALIZATION PROGRAM” AND A GENERAL LOOK AT TRACK-TWO DIPLOMACY EFFORTS
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 29.05.2017 -
ECHR’S DOĞU PERINÇEK DECISION REGARDING THE ARTICLE 10 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 19.12.2013 -
ARMENIAN ATTEMPTS FOR THE RECOGNITION OF NAGORNO KARABAKH AND BELGIAN PARLIAMANTERIANS’ VISIT TO STEPANAKERT
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 27.03.2017
-
MONUMENT TO BE RAISED IN MEMORY OF THE MARTYS OF THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF TURKEY
AVİM 08.04.2015 -
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION AFTER THE HOLIDAYS II
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 05.09.2011 -
THE DOCUMENTS EXPOSING CHINA’S HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 27.12.2021 -
THE PROTOCOLS SIGNED WITH ARMENIA
Alev KILIÇ 21.10.2012 -
FORTRESS EUROPE PROPELS TURKEY TOWARDS EURASIA
Alev KILIÇ 12.02.2013
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER -
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE
-
THE SEARCH FOR REGIONAL STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR: VIEWS FROM GEORGIA AND TURKEY