In the daily bulletin of Center for Eurasian Studies dated 1 October 2012, a news item was published in which Stefan Füle, EU Commissioner responsible for enlargement, had reiterated the Union’s open door policy towards the Western Balkan countries. It is noteworthy to state what this news item and Füle’s statements evoke for Turkey and the Balkans. As it is well known, the Balkans is a region in the southeast of Europe with distinguishing geographical, political, cultural, social and demographic features. As a matter of fact, the Balkans has been an inseparable part of Europe throughout history and the soft belly of Western Europe. Turkey, which has a focal position in the crossroads of continents and regions, is also a Balkan country. As such, Turkey has always been active in Balkan affairs, has opposed the negative and belittling approach which was coined as “balkanization” in recent times and has always been in the forefront for the stability and cooperation among the Balkan countries. The EU has come to realize years ago that it was inevitable to include the Balkans in the EU enlargement and concrete steps have been taken in this direction. On the other hand, the fact that Turkey is a Balkan country seems to have led the EU into adopting a discriminatory approach towards the Balkans, coming up with the creation of a novel division labeled as “Western Balkans”. It is understood that the “Western Balkans” entails the new republics which gained their independence from the disintegrated Yugoslavian territories and Albania. The west has an east. However, the east is not mentioned for the Balkans and the EU policies have encouraged the perception that Greece, Bulgaria and Romania complete the east. It would be appropriate to take into consideration that a membership negotiation process which excludes Turkey from the Balkans is bound to weaken Turkey’s European references.
© 2009-2024 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
WHY IS THE EUROPEAN UNION ON THE WAY TO BECOMING A FORTRESS EUROPE, CLOSED TO THE OUTSIDE WORLD
Alev KILIÇ 16.01.2013 -
“HABEMUS PAPAM”
Alev KILIÇ 13.03.2013 -
THE PROPOSAL TO OPEN THE ARCHIVES TO THE JOINT RESEARCH OF TURKISH, ARMENIAN AND IMPARTIAL SPECIALISTS, SCHOLARS AND HISTORIANS IS STILL VALID
Alev KILIÇ 21.12.2012 -
THE DIRECTION OF THE WORLD’S ECONOMY (2) – THE EUROPEAN UNION, EURASIAN UNION, CHINA AND TURKEY
Alev KILIÇ 25.12.2012 -
THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA’S STATEMENTS: NOT FOR RECONCILIATION, BUT TO SEEK REVENGE
Alev KILIÇ 08.02.2013
-
POLITICAL INSTABILITY BRINGS OBSTACLES TO MOLDOVA ON THE WAY TOWARDS THE EU
Gülperi GÜNGÖR 23.06.2020 -
CLOSER COOPERATION BETWEEN CHINA AND TURKEY
Pelin EMLİK 10.09.2015 -
TÜRKİYE'S EVOLVING ROLE AS A EURASIAN NEXUS: A BALANCED PERSPECTIVE
Teoman Ertuğrul TULUN 04.07.2024 -
THE ECHR PERINCEK V. SWITZERLAND CASE: THE GRAND CHAMBER HAS RULED IN FAVOR OF DOGU PERINCEK
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 14.10.2015 -
YEREVAN’S AZERBAIJANI PAST
AVİM 23.10.2020
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"