The European Union (EU) and China have reached a consensus on the terms of their investment agreement after being in negotiations since 2014. The investment agreement negotiations between the parties were concluded at the EU-China Leaders Meeting held with the participation of the President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the EU Council Charles Michel, the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the President of France Emmanuel Macron, and the Chinese President Xi Jinping. After the meeting, Von der Leyen emphasized in her statement that they aimed at achieving a balanced trade and increasing business opportunities with this agreement. In 2019, China became the EU’s second largest trading partner, and both sides traded goods worth 1 billion euros per day. With this agreement, it is aimed to open several markets of China from healthcare to telecommunications to foreign investors and to further increase commercial affairs. At the end of the negotiations, China agreed to open its manufacturing industry to EU investors with some limited exceptions. This is a huge success considering that more than half of EU investments in China are concentrated in the manufacturing sector. The agreement will also give EU investors greater access to Chinese markets. The EU market is already open to investment in the service sector under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). In addition to that, referring to the sensitivity of sectors for the EU such as energy, agriculture, fisheries, and public services, the EU Commission declared that these sectors are all protected in the EU-China agreement.
Although the deal was welcomed by the business community, it has also caused harsh criticisms. The focus of these criticisms is on the human rights and labor rights violations in China. In this context, the oppression and rights violations against Uyghur Turks are frequently criticized. For the agreement to come into force, it must be approved by the European Parliament and at this point, it has been signaled that China’s Uyghur policy may make this approval process difficult. In response to these criticisms, Von der Leyen emphasized that “With the agreement, the EU has acquired a trump card to combat forced labor.” Meanwhile, German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that the EU-China agreement on investment is a very important step that would both protect investments more and make China more transparent. In short, according to the EU, this agreement aims to globalize the values defended by the EU (clearly defined with environmental protection criteria and human and labor rights issues in mind) and to include China in this process through the economy.
There are important differences of opinion in the West regarding the business connection developed with China. Each country continues its relations with China in line with its own interests. In this period where a change of administration has taken place in the United States, the meaning of the EU-China agreement for the US is particularly important. China, which experienced various problems in its commercial relations with the US during the former Donald Trump administration, faced restrictions on 5G technology and Huawei’s activities. The agreement with the EU is particularly striking, as Beijing’s attention has now turned to the shape of relations with the new US administration of Joe Biden. At a regular press conference held in the capital Beijing in January, the Spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that the bridges burned in bilateral relations during the Trump era should be rebuilt and the damaged roads should be repaired, and expressed that there is a great expectation for China and the US relations to enter into the right orbit as soon as possible with the Biden administration.
While the reaction of Biden and his advisers on the deal has not yet fully taken shape, shortly before the agreement was reached, on December 22, 2020, US national security adviser Jake Sullivan shared a post on Twitter that the US administration would welcome consultations with European partners on common concerns about China’s practices. However, the China-EU agreement shows that this implicit warning by the US has been ignored by the EU. After the deal on agreement, Sullivan stated in an interview that the Biden administration wants to urgently hold a meeting with European allies to establish a common agenda regarding Chinese trade practices.
The EU and the US share common strategic and political goals on China. One of the most important of these is to stop China’s human rights violations. Despite this, the EU-China investment agreement may weaken the Biden administration’s efforts to get closer to the EU in the future. On the other hand, the Minister of Economy and Energy of Germany stated that the EU does not consider the agreement reached with China to be a mistake, and stated that this agreement is similar to the agreement that the US has with China and that it is about creating equal conditions for all parties. Therefore, the EU thinks that the agreement with China brings them closer to economic equality with the US. However, it seems that the deal will damage both the EU’s comparative advantage over China and its transatlantic alliance with the US.
From an economic perspective, the primary winners will be large European firms in various manufacturing and service sectors such as the automobile, chemical, communications and healthcare industries, banking, and transportation. Large German and French companies, which are currently already located in China, are seen as the biggest beneficiaries. At the geopolitical level, the biggest winner is China. The agreement will save China from withdrawing from its trade war with the US. The losers of the agreement are those who have advocated for the restoration and strengthening of the US-EU transatlantic relationship and human rights and labor rights defenders. The EU-China agreement on investment is of great importance in liberalization and geostrategic aspects. The global impact of the agreement are eagerly awaited.
*Photograph: Deutsche Welle
 “AB ile Çin’den tarihi ticaret anlaşması”, Deutsche Welle Türkçe, 30 Aralık 2020, https://www.dw.com/tr/ab-ile-%C3%A7inden-tarihi-ticaret-anla%C5%9Fmas%C4%B1/a-56099560
 Ata Ufuk Şeker, “AB ve Çin yatırım anlaşmasında uzlaştı”, Anadolu Ajansı, 30 Aralık 2020, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/ab-ve-cin-yatirim-anlasmasinda-uzlasti/2093800
 “AB ile Çin arasında yatırım anlaşması imzalandı”, Bloomberg HT, 30 Aralık 2020, https://www.bloomberght.com/ab-ile-cin-arasinda-yatirim-anlasmasi-imzalandi-2271709
 Sofia Baruzzi, “EU, China Reach Agreement on Investments in Principle: What Does it Mean for Businesses”, China Briefing, January 14, 2021, https://www.china-briefing.com/news/eu-china-reach-agreement-on-investments-in-principle-what-does-it-mean-for-businesses/
 Hüseyin Koyuncu, “AB ile Çin arasında 6 yıl süren müzakerelerin ardından varılan yatırım anlaşması imzalandı”, Euronews, 30 Aralık 2020, https://tr.euronews.com/2020/12/30/ab-ile-cin-aras-nda-6-y-l-suren-muzakerelerin-ard-ndan-var-lan-yat-r-m-anlasmas-imzaland
 “AB ile Çin’den tarihi ticaret anlaşması”.
 “Merkel’den Çin’e üstü kapalı ticaret mesajı”, Dünya Haber Merkezi, 26 Ocak 2021, https://www.dunya.com/dunya/merkelden-cine-ustu-kapali-ticaret-mesaji-haberi-608558
 Ceyda Karan, “Çin belki de son yatırım anlaşmasıyla tarihindeki en geniş imtiyazları AB’ye verdi”, Sputnik Türkiye, 4 Ocak 2021, https://tr.sputniknews.com/ceyda_karan_eksen/202101041043518900-cin-belki-de-son-yatirim-anlasmasiyla-tarihindeki-en-genis-imtiyazlari-abye-verdi/
 Fuat Kabakcı, “Çin yeni ABD Başkanı Biden'ı ikili ilişkileri onarmaya çağırdı”, Anadolu Ajansı, 21 Ocak 2021, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/cin-yeni-abd-baskani-bideni-ikili-iliskileri-onarmaya-cagirdi/2118213
 Steven Erlanger, “Will the Sudden E.U.-China Deal Damage Relations With Biden?”, New York Times, January 18, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/06/world/europe/eu-china-deal-biden.html
 Mercy A. Kuo, “What Does the EU-China Investment Deal Mean for US-EU Relations?”, The Diplomat, January 12, 2021, https://thediplomat.com/2021/01/what-does-the-eu-china-investment-deal-mean-for-us-eu-relations/
 “Lagarde: Ekonomik toparlanma gecikebilir”, Dünya Haber Merkezi, 25 Ocak 2021, https://www.dunya.com/kuresel-ekonomi/lagarde-ekonomik-toparlanma-gecikebilir-haberi-608400
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
GEORGIA-TURKEY RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE MESKHETIAN TURKS ISSUE
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 18.12.2020
THE REFLECTIONS OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR ON ARMENIA AND THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 11.12.2020
THE EFFECT OF THE UYGHUR TURKS ON TURKEY-CHINA RELATIONS
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 06.01.2021
HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE EU-CHINA AGREEMENT ON INVESTMENT
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 08.02.2021
UKRAINE’S DECISION CONCERNING “THE STATUS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES”
Şevval Beste GÖKÇELİK 11.08.2021
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION AFTER THE HOLIDAYS IV
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 07.09.2011
THE NECESSITY FOR A NEW STRATEGY
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 27.05.2015
Alev KILIÇ 05.02.2013
MONUMENT ERECTED IN FETHIYE FOR TURKISH DIPLOMATS ASSASSINATED BY ARMENIAN TERRORISM
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 01.09.2015
THE FAIRYTALES OF THE DASHNAK PARTY
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 26.06.2014
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE