The end of the Cold War is often discussed in term of its international consequences such as the evolution of world politics into a new order. In these days when regionalism shines out, the cold war has inherited backward rooted problems in the Balkans. The name problem between Macedonia and Greece is the one of the main problems among the results caused by the problems in regards to national, regional and even international level of importance.
As we mentioned in our previous articles, the root cause of the problem is historical. Macedonia was established in northern Greece in the First Age. By 4th century B.C. It dominated the entire ancient Greek world and spread the Hellenic culture to a wide geography with the conquests of Alexander the Great. Even today, Greeks accept ancient Macedonia as a part of their national history. Upon being Independent in 1991, Macedonian accepted themselves as the successor of Ancient Macedonia and they carried out their national symbols and nation-building process accordingly. Greece, on the other hand, considered this attitude as an expansionist one towards Aegean Macedonia. In Greece public opinion, it was argued that would Macedonia claim lands from Aegean Macedonia in the long run. Greece’s first reaction was to issue economic embargo or limit the two nations relations, but they did not end it there. In the case of Macedonia's membership to NATO and the EU, Greece did not hesitate to block the international integration of Macedonia by giving a veto vote.
In addition to serious international efforts, in both countries there are new governments who think and clearly states that the problem between the two countries is becoming more and more inaccessible as time goes by and their view for a solution is more moderate. The Prespa Agreement made on 17 June 2018 struck hope for a solution. The reason why we cannot use a definite statement with it is that this agreement caused protests and opposition parties objections in both countries. The process for the agreement to be approved by the assembly was a relatively long and uncertain one. As it is known, it is a necessity to be approved by all the relevant countries councils for an international agreement to take action. In addition to this, in both countries, widespread protests were made after the signing of the agreement and the public was discontent. The experts of the region were pessimistic on their analysis from time to time. They argued whether the agreement was a stillborn or not.
In short, the content of the agreement was, the parties involved negotiated around several different names and they have finally agreed on the Republic of Northern Macedonia. At June 17th, both countries Minister of Foreign Affairs signed this agreement which changed Macedonia’s official name and makes it use this new name in everywhere. A new dual-use was adopted for the passports of Macedonian citizens in which the nationality part read Macedonian/Northern Macedonian. And the word “Macedonian” could be used to indicate ethnicity and official language (Article 7). The treaty also included many articles on mutual good will, respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity, and the development of bilateral relations.
The agreement was passed by parliament on 11 January 2019, almost seven months after the signing of the agreement, despite public protests of the Macedonia people, opposition and even the president's objections. This process has been evaluated more thoroughly in our article titled “Macedonia Name Change Referendum: Different Interests, Different Perspectives”. As expected, especially in NATO and the EU evaluated the legalization of the agreement with great joy. For example, U.S. Ambassador of Skopje Jess Baily stated that the United States welcomed the decision and that the approval of Prespa Agreement was a historic moment. In Greece, the agreement was discussed in parliament while nationalist groups were protesting on the streets. Even though the Greek opposition defined the agreement as a defeat for Greece, the agreement was passed by the Greece parliament on 25 January 2019. President of the European Council, Donald Tusk congratulated the agreement by saying “They had imagination, they took the risk, they were ready to sacrifice their own interests for the greater good. Mission impossible accomplished .”Following the mutual acceptance of the treaty in the parliaments, messages were sent for the goodwill between the two countries.
In all this process, it can be said that Macedonia's main motivation is to become a member of EU and NATO. On February 6, 2019, Macedonia’s NATO accession protocol was signed in Brussels. Shortly after that, on February 8, the Greek Parliament approved the agreement for Macedonia entry into NATO. Thus, Macedonia, as predicted, received its first approval from Greece. Even though Macedonia has met all NATO standards since 2008, it could not be a part of the organization because of the name issue. Macedonia will contribute approximately 1.2 million Euros to NATO’s budget as one of their responsibilities as a NATO member.
Turkey is among the first countries who recognized Macedonia with its official name after their independence. In this process, Turkey was opposed to the imposition for the name change and emphasized that it should be decided by the Macedonian people. Turkey, as in other Balkan countries, always supported Macedonia’s accession to Euro-Atlantic institutions for the sake of prosperity and stability of the region. Because the name issue is solved will accelerate the accession of membership to these institutions for Macedonia, it will be a positive development for Turkey.
 Mehmet Uğur Ekinci, “Makedonya İsim Sorunu Çözülüyor (Mu?)”. SETA Perspective. Sayı: 204 (2018 Haziran), 1. (date of access 15.02.2019)
 “Macedonia and Greece Sign Historic Deal on Name Change” last updated 17 June, 2018
 “Final Agreement for the Settlement of the Differences as Described in the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 817 (1993) and 845 (1993), the Termination of the Interim Accord of 1995, and the Establishment of a Strategic Partnership between the Parties”, Ekathimerini, 12 June 2018. (date of access 15.02.2019)
 “Macedonia Implements Prespa Agreement” last update: 12 January, 2019
 Vuslat Nur Şahin, “Macedonia Name Change Referandum: Different Interests, Different Perspectives” . AVİM, Issue:29/2018 (2019 September), 1 (date of access 16.02.2019)
 “Uluslararası Camiadan Makedonya’ya Tebrik Mesajları” last update 11 January, 2019
 “Greece Ratifies Prespa Agreement” last update: 25 January, 2019
 “Yunan parlamentosu, Makedonya isim anlaşmasını onayladı” last update 25 January, 2019 https://tr.sputniknews.com/avrupa/201901251037296094-yunan-parlamentosu-makedonya-isim-anlasmasini-onayladi/
 “Macedonia signs NATO agreement” last update: 7 January, 2019
 “Greece approves Macedonia NATO bid” last update: 8 February, 2019
 “NATO Üyeliği Yılda 1,2 Milyon Euro’ya Mal Olacak” last update 7 February, 2019
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
TRANS PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP TRADE PACT WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES: INCREASED ELBOW ROOM FOR JAPAN IN EAST ASIA
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 10.01.2019
AN EVALUATION OF THE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 08.07.2019
A VIEW ABOUT 18TH MEETING OF SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION COUNCIL OF HEADS OF MEMBER STATES
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 19.06.2018
CONFERENCE ENTITLED “TÜRKİYE VE KORE: GELİŞEN AVRASYA’DA İKİ KÖPRÜ BAŞI” (TURKEY AND KOREA: TWO BRIDGEHEADS IN THE THRIVING EURASIA)
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 30.11.2017
THE OUTCOMES OF VOSTOK 2018
Vuslat Nur ŞAHİN 28.09.2018
TURKEY-ARMENIA PROTOCOLS: THE FIRST YEAR
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 11.10.2010
REPORT SUMMARY: HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH REPORT RIGHTS IN RETREAT: ABUSES IN CRIMEA
Maryna SHEVTSOVA 26.11.2014
THE ARMENIAN PATRIARCHATE OF JERUSALEM COMPLAINS OF RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WHILE CONTINUING ITS UNDUE POSSESSION
ARMENIAN SPIES: HISTORICAL ROOTS OF ARMENIAN ESPIONAGE
JOSEPH BORRELL’S VISIT TO ANKARA AND ITS AFTERMATH
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 29.07.2020
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923)
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE
THE SEARCH FOR REGIONAL STABILITY AND COOPERATION IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE 2020 KARABAKH WAR: VIEWS FROM GEORGIA AND TURKEY