
According to news reports, the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem, which is one of the four administrative centers of the Armenian Apostolic Church, has applied to the Constitutional Court of Turkey in March for the return of the estates that it claims belongs to the Mar Jacob (Saint James) Armenian Church Foundation affiliated to the Patriarchate and for the annulment of the state appropriation of the foundation.[1] The Patriarchate has stated that it is in fact the same entity as the Mar Jacob Armenian Church Foundation, hence the only official of the foundation is Patriarch Nurhan Manukyan, the spiritual leader of the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem. The Patriarchate has claimed that there are more than a hundred estates within Turkey’s borders that belong to the Mar Jacob Armenian Church Foundation.
The Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem, having apparently failed to attain its desired outcome from lower instance courts, has applied to the Constitutional Court as a last resort in terms of domestic remedies. It is not known what kind of verdict the Constitutional Court will deliver. However, if it cannot attain its desired outcome, the Jerusalem Patriarchate will probably apply to the European Court of Human Rights – which is what the Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia had done in the past[2] (Note: The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia’s application was rejected by the ECtHR).
At this point, there is an important issue that needs to be reminded to the readers: Some of the archival documents that belong to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul have been held in the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem since 1938. During the period of the Turkish War of Independence, in November 1922 -when it was understood that İstanbul would come under Turkish control again, the Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul Zaven I Der Yeghiayan sent 22 chests full of the Patriarchate’s archival documents to a colleague in the United Kingdom.[3] These documents were then moved to France in 1927. In 1938, they were sent to the Armenian Patriarch of Jerusalem in office at the time. Ever since then, the Patriarchate of Jerusalem has not taken any steps for the return of these documents and has allowed only a few partisan researchers to see them. For example, even Armenian historians who are not considered partisan, such as Ara Sarafian, have not been allowed to see these archival documents. It has been reported that the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul has, after 1938, attempted to have these documents returned. Looking at the outcome, however, it is obvious that this attempt has failed.
Even if it is not known for certain what is in the archival documents in question, it can be surmised that they contain the Patriarchate of Istanbul’s internal correspondences during the final period of the Ottoman Empire and documents collected by Patriarchate officials for the Istanbul investigations and trials of 1918-1920.[4] In 2001, Armenian historian Dennis R. Papazian claimed that the documents in question had been obtained and viewed by him and his friends, and that they would debunk “denialist” Turkish theses with these documents.[5] However, despite the 17 years that have passed, there has been no developments on this matter.
Two points can be gathered from what has been written above: 1) These documents belong to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul, and for approximately 96 years, they have been waiting to be returned to the place they belong. 2) These documents may be useful in better understanding the 1915 events and the subsequent developments. For this reason, these documents must not be reserved for the sole use of partisan historians and, instead, must be made accessible to everyone.
Therefore, before the Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem claims that its rights are being violated, it should first face the fact that it has been continuing its undue possession of the said archival documents since 1938 and return these documents it has so far withheld to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul. In this respect, it would be helpful for the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul to make further efforts to have these documents returned.
*Photo: A section of the Armenian Quarter of Jerusalem - T24.com.tr
[1] “Kudüs Ermeni Patrikhanesi, Türkiye'deki mülklerin iadesi için Anayasa Mahkemesi'ne başvurdu,” T24, 26 Mart 2018, http://t24.com.tr/haber/kudus-ermeni-patrikhanesi-turkiyedeki-mulklerin-iadesi-icin-anayasa-mahkemesine-basvurdu; “Armenian Patriarch of Jerusalem applies to Constitutional Court of Turkey,” Aravot-en.am, March 23, 2018, http://www.aravot-en.am/2018/03/23/209431/
[2] Mehmet Oğuzhan Tulun, “The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia’s Application to the Constitutional Court of Turkey”, Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM), Commentary No: 2016/69, http://avim.org.tr/en/Yorum/THE-ARMENIAN-CATHOLICOSATE-OF-CILICIA-S-APPLICATION-TO-THE-CONSTITUTIONAL-COURT-OF-TURKEY
[3] Raymond Kévorkian, The Armenian Genocide - A Complete History (London: I.B. Tauris, 2011), 4-5.
[4] Kévorkian, The Armenian Genocide, 4-5 ; Nejdet Bilgi (ed.), Yozgat Ermeni Tehciri Davası (İstanbul: Kitabevi, 2006), 50-51.
[5] Bilgi, Yozgat Ermeni Tehciri Davası, 51.
© 2009-2021 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
EU OBSERVER IN THE SPOTLIGHT AGAIN
AVİM 26.10.2020 -
DELEGATION of AVIM VISITED the ECO SECRETARIAT
AVİM 17.09.2015 -
BLACK STAIN ON COUNTER TERRORISM: HAMPIG SASUNYAN CASE
AVİM 28.01.2020 -
THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TURKISH-ARMENIAN RELATIONS AND GREAT POWERS ORGANIZED BY ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY IN ERZURUM ENDS TODAY
AVİM 07.05.2015 -
A PUBLIC CONVERSATION WITH ULUÇ GÜRKAN ON MALTA TRIBUNALS
AVİM 17.05.2015
-
THE BRAZILIAN MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS HAS DISAPPOINTED ARMENIA
AVİM 22.11.2017 -
NEW DRAFT RESOLUTIONS IN THE U.S.A
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 16.06.2011 -
ARMENIA AND THE ARMENIAN DIASPORA
Alev KILIÇ 08.10.2012 -
ANOTHER INSTANCE OF RADICAL ARMENIAN NATIONALISM AND TURCOPHOBIA BEING JUSTIFIED: SUMBAD BOROYAN
Ahmet Can ÖKTEM 18.10.2020 -
TURKISH RUSSIAN JOINT MONITORING CENTER BECAME OPERATIONAL AT AGHDAM
Tutku DİLAVER 17.02.2021
-
Türk-Ermeni İlişkileri Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2021 -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2020 -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2019 -
Türk-Ermeni Uyuşmazlığı Üzerine Ömer Engin Lütem Konferansları 2018 -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
Ermeni Sorunu Temel Bilgi ve Belgeler (2. Baskı)
-
BALKANLAR'DA SOYKIRIM KAVRAMININ HUKUKİ TANIMININ VE İÇERİĞİNİN DEĞİŞTİRİLMESİ İÇİN YAPILAN YERSİZ VE YOZLAŞTIRICI GİRİŞİMLER -
AVİM 2021 YILLIK RAPOR | ANNUAL REPORT -
DEGENERATING DISCURSIVE ATTEMPTS IN THE BALKANS TO ALTER THE LEGAL DEFINITION AND CONTENT OF THE CONCEPT OF GENOCIDE
-
BOOK PRESENTATION - “THE TURKS AND EUROPE” BY GASTON GAILLARD