
Following the “Parliamentary” elections held on 3 May 2015 in Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijan’s territory which is under occupation of Armenia for more than 20 years, “local elections” were held on 13 September 2015. Many countries and international organizations declared that they do not recognize the results of these elections.
Statements underlined Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity within its sovereignty and internationally recognized borders, and indicated that these elections were illegal.
The Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs also condemned these elections. The Ministry’s statement on the latest “local elections” is as follows:[1]
“The above mentioned “local elections”, planned to be held within a short time following the “Parliamentary” elections held on 3 May 2015 in the said region, are a clear breach of the principles of international law, the UN Security Council resolutions and the principles of the OSCE. This and other similar actions impair the efforts to reach a peaceful and lasting solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.
Turkey condemns these elections which will constitute a new violation of Azerbaijan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. These elections and its results, which we consider illegal shall not be recognized by Turkey.”
In her statement, the spokeswoman for the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy the European Union said that the European Union does not recognize the constitutional and legal framework within which “elections” are being held in Nagorno-Karabakh.[2] A similar statement was made on the elections held on May 3.[3]
Spokesperson for the US Department of State also stated that the United States does not recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent sovereign state, and they will not accept the results of the so-called elections on the 13th of September as affecting the legal status of the region.[4]
Furthermore, in addition to countries such as Germany, Ukraine, China, Pakistan and Indonesia, similar statements were made also by international organizations such as OSCE and Islamic Cooperation Organization.
The increasing number of countries and organizations day by day which emphasizes Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and sovereignty is causing political disappointments for Armenia, which also took a major legal blow by ECHR’s judgement on the “Chiragov and Others v. Armenia”.[5] It is seen that Armenia’s efforts to legitimize the ‘republic’ in Nagorno-Karabakh through elections are fruitless. The obvious fact that Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding seven regions, which are internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territories, are occupied by Armenia is uttered more commonly.
Certainly, it is a known fact that some of the above-mentioned countries apply double standards on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. It is clear that these countries which took up a clear position on the Crimean issue are not as determined on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue which remains unresolved for more than 20 years. However, reactions to these elections and ECHR’s final judgment are positive developments in terms of the violation of international law in Nagorno-Karabakh.
[1] http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-250_-11-september-2015_-press-release-regarding-the-so_called-local-elections-planned-to-be-held-in-nagorno_karabakh-region-of-the-republic-of-azerbaijan.en.mfa
[5] For the detailed information on ECHR’s judgement on the case of “Chiragov and Others v. Armenia” see. Turgut Tuncel, “The Nagorno-Karabakh Issue from a Juridical Point of View: the Case of Chiragov and Others v. Armenia”, AVIM, http://www.avim.org.tr/yorumnotlarduyurular/en/THE-NAGORNO-KARABAKH-ISSUE-FROM-A-JURIDICAL-POINT-OF-VIEW:-THE-CASE-OF-CHIRAGOV-AND-OTHERS-V--ARMENIA/4133
© 2009-2025 Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) All Rights Reserved
No comments yet.
-
TURKEY BECAME THE 11th LARGEST PARTNER OF THE NEW ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 21.01.2016 -
CONTRADICTIONS REVEALED WITH THE DEBATES ON SREBRENICA IN THE UN
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 12.07.2015 -
BOOK REVIEW-SASUN: THE HISTORY OF AN 1890S ARMENIAN REVOLT
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 12.04.2015 -
POPE FINALLY APOLOGIZES FOR CHURCH’S ROLE IN THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 23.03.2017 -
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND ITS RESOLUTION ON THE 2015 PROGRESS REPORT ON TURKEY
Ali Murat TAŞKENT 20.04.2016
-
EXAMPLES OF WIKIPEDIA'S FREQUENT DOUBLE STANDARDS: “WESTERN AZERBAIJAN” AND “WESTERN ARMENIA”
Hazel ÇAĞAN ELBİR 11.12.2024 -
CONCERNING A ROUND TABLE MEETING
Aslan Yavuz ŞİR 09.03.2015 -
ARMEN SARKISSIAN’S PRESIDENCY AND THE QUESTIONS ON ETHICS AND POLITICAL CULTURE IN ARMENIA (26.01.2022)
Turgut Kerem TUNCEL 26.01.2022 -
PRESIDENT SARKISIAN VISITING NICOSIA AND ATHENS
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 20.01.2011 -
ARMENIAN GENOCIDE FILMS FAIL TO WIN ACCLAIM
Ömer Engin LÜTEM 08.09.2014
-
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION - BASIC KNOWLEDGE AND DOCUMENTATION -
THE TRUTH WILL OUT -
RADİKAL ERMENİ UNSURLARCA GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLEN MEZALİMLER VE VANDALİZM -
PATRIOTISM PERVERTED -
MEN ARE LIKE THAT -
BAKÜ-TİFLİS-CEYHAN BORU HATTININ YAŞANAN TARİHİ -
INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARS ON THE EVENTS OF 1915 -
FAKE PHOTOS AND THE ARMENIAN PROPAGANDA -
ERMENİ PROPAGANDASI VE SAHTE RESİMLER -
A Letter From Japan - Strategically Mum: The Silence of the Armenians -
Japonya'dan Bir Mektup - Stratejik Suskunluk: Ermenilerin Sessizliği -
Anastas Mikoyan: Confessions of an Armenian Bolshevik -
Sovyet Sonrası Ukrayna’da Devlet, Toplum ve Siyaset - Değişen Dinamikler, Dönüşen Kimlikler -
Ermeni Sorunuyla İlgili İngiliz Belgeleri (1912-1923) - British Documents on Armenian Question (1912-1923) -
Turkish-Russian Academics: A Historical Study on the Caucasus -
Gürcistan'daki Müslüman Topluluklar: Azınlık Hakları, Kimlik, Siyaset -
Armenian Diaspora: Diaspora, State and the Imagination of the Republic of Armenia -
ERMENİ SORUNU - TEMEL BİLGİ VE BELGELER (2. BASKI)
-
CONFERENCE TITLED “HUNGARY’S PERSPECTIVES ON THE TURKIC WORLD"